said：　Protagoras；　I　have　a　wretched　memory；　and　when　any　one　makes　a
  long　speech　to　me　I　never　remember　what　he　is　talking　about。　As
  then；　if　I　had　been　deaf；　and　you　were　going　to　converse　with　me；
  you　would　have　had　to　raise　your　voice；　so　now；　having　such　a　bad
  memory；　I　will　ask　you　to　cut　your　answers　shorter；　if　you　would
  take　me　with　you。
  What　do　you　mean？　he　said：　how　am　I　to　shorten　my　answers？　shall　I
  make　them　too　short？
  Certainly　not；　I　said。
  But　short　enough？
  Yes；　I　said。
  Shall　I　answer　what　appears　to　me　to　be　short　enough；　or　what
  appears　to　you　to　be　short　enough？
  I　have　heard；　I　said；　that　you　can　speak　and　teach　others　to　speak
  about　the　same　things　at　such　length　that　words　never　seemed　to
  fail；　or　with　such　brevity　that　no　one　could　use　fewer　of　them。　Please
  therefore；　if　you　talk　with　me；　to　adopt　the　latter　or　more
  compendious　method。
  Socrates；　he　replied；　many　a　battle　of　words　have　I　fought；　and　if　I
  had　followed　the　method　of　disputation　which　my　adversaries　desired；
  as　you　want　me　to　do；　I　should　have　been　no　better　than　another；　and
  the　name　of　Protagoras　would　have　been　nowhere。
  I　saw　that　he　was　not　satisfied　with　his　previous　answers；　and
  that　he　would　not　play　the　part　of　answerer　any　more　if　he　could　help；
  and　I　considered　that　there　was　no　call　upon　me　to　continue　the
  conversation；　so　I　said：　Protagoras；　I　do　not　wish　to　force　the
  conversation　upon　you　if　you　had　rather　not；　but　when　you　are
  willing　to　argue　with　me　in　such　a　way　that　I　can　follow　you；　then　I
  will　argue　with　you。　Now　you；　as　is　said　of　you　by　others　and　as　you
  say　of　yourself；　are　able　to　have　discussions　in　shorter　forms　of
  speech　as　well　as　in　longer；　for　you　are　a　master　of　wisdom；　but　I
  cannot　manage　these　long　speeches：　I　only　wish　that　I　could。　You；　on
  the　other　hand；　who　are　capable　of　either；　ought　to　speak　shorter　as　I
  beg　you；　and　then　we　might　converse。　But　I　see　that　you　are
  disinclined；　and　as　I　have　an　engagement　which　will　prevent　my　staying
  to　hear　you　at　greater　length　（for　I　have　to　be　in　another　place）；　I
  will　depart；　although　I　should　have　liked　to　have　heard　you。
  Thus　I　spoke；　and　was　rising　from　my　seat；　when　Callias　seized　me　by
  the　right　hand；　and　in　his　left　hand　caught　hold　of　this　old　cloak
  of　mine。　He　said：　We　cannot　let　you　go；　Socrates；　for　if　you　leave
  us　there　will　be　an　end　of　our　discussions：　I　must　therefore　beg　you
  to　remain；　as　there　is　nothing　in　the　world　that　I　should　like
  better　than　to　hear　you　and　Protagoras　discourse。　Do　not　deny　the
  company　this　pleasure。
  Now　I　had　got　up；　and　was　in　the　act　of　departure。　Son　of
  Hipponicus；　I　replied；　I　have　always　admired；　and　do　now　heartily
  applaud　and　love　your　philosophical　spirit；　and　I　would　gladly
  comply　with　your　request；　if　I　could。　But　the　truth　is　that　I
  cannot。　And　what　you　ask　is　as　great　an　impossibility　to　me；　as　if　you
  bade　me　run　a　race　with　Crison　of　Himera；　when　in　his　prime；　or　with
  some　one　of　the　long　or　day　course　runners。　To　such　a　request　I　should
  reply　that　I　would　fain　ask　the　same　of　my　own　legs；　but　they　refuse
  to　comply。　And　therefore　if　you　want　to　see　Crison　and　me　in　the
  same　stadium；　you　must　bid　him　slacken　his　speed　to　mine；　for　I　cannot
  run　quickly；　and　he　can　run　slowly。　And　in　like　manner　if　you　want
  to　hear　me　and　Protagoras　discoursing；　you　must　ask　him　to　shorten　his
  answers；　and　keep　to　the　point；　as　he　did　at　first；　if　not；　how　can
  there　be　any　discussion？　For　discussion　is　one　thing；　and　making　an
  oration　is　quite　another；　in　my　humble　opinion。
  But　you　see；　Socrates；　said　Callias；　that　Protagoras　may　fairly
  claim　to　speak　in　his　own　way；　just　as　you　claim　to　speak　in　yours。
  Here　Alcibiades　interposed；　and　said：　That；　Callias；　is　not　a　true
  statement　of　the　case。　For　our　friend　Socrates　admits　that　he　cannot
  make　a　speech…in　this　he　yields　the　palm　to　Protagoras：　but　I　should
  be　greatly　surprised　if　he　yielded　to　any　living　man　in　the　power　of
  holding　and　apprehending　an　argument。　Now　if　Protagoras　will　make　a
  similar　admission；　and　confess　that　he　is　inferior　to　Socrates　in
  argumentative　skill；　that　is　enough　for　Socrates；　but　if　he　claims　a
  superiority　in　argument　as　well；　let　him　ask　and　answer…not；　when　a
  question　is　asked；　slipping　away　from　the　point；　and　instead　of
  answering；　making　a　speech　at　such　length　that　most　of　his　hearers
  forget　the　question　at　issue　（not　that　Socrates　is　likely　to
  forget…I　will　be　bound　for　that；　although　he　may　pretend　in　fun　that
  he　has　a　bad　memory）。　And　Socrates　appears　to　me　to　be　more　in　the
  right　than　Protagoras；　that　is　my　view；　and　every　man　ought　to　say
  what　he　thinks。
  When　Alcibiades　had　done　speaking；　some　one…Critias；　I
  believe…went　on　to　say：　O　Prodicus　and　Hippias；　Callias　appears　to
  me　to　be　a　partisan　of　Protagoras：　and　this　led　Alcibiades；　who
  loves　opposition；　to　take　the　other　side。　But　we　should　not　be
  partisans　either　of　Socrates　or　of　Protagoras；　let　us　rather　unite
  in　entreating　both　of　them　not　to　break　up　the　discussion。
  Prodicus　added：　That；　Critias；　seems　to　me　to　be　well　said；　for
  those　who　are　present　at　such　discussions　ought　to　be　impartial
  hearers　of　both　the　speakers；　remembering；　however；　that
  impartiality　is　not　the　same　as　equality；　for　both　sides　should　be
  impartially　heard；　and　yet　an　equal　meed　should　not　be　assigned　to
  both　of　them；　but　to　the　wiser　a　higher　meed　should　be　given；　and　a
  lower　to　the　less　wise。　And　I　as　well　as　Critias　would　beg　you；
  Protagoras　and　Socrates；　to　grant　our　request；　which　is；　that　you　will
  argue　with　one　another　and　not　wrangle；　for　friends　argue　with　friends
  out　of　goodwill；　but　only　adversaries　and　enemies　wrangle。　And　then
  our　meeting　will　be　delightful；　for　in　this　way　you；　who　are　the
  speakers；　will　be　most　likely　to　win　esteem；　and　not　praise　only；
  among　us　who　are　your　audience；　for　esteem　is　a　sincere　conviction
  of　the　hearers'　souls；　but　praise　is　often　an　insincere　expression
  of　men　uttering　falsehoods　contrary　to　their　conviction。　And　thus　we
  who　are　the　hearers　will　be　gratified　and　not　pleased；　for
  gratification　is　of　the　mind　when　receiving　wisdom　and　knowledge；
  but　pleasure　is　of　the　body　when　eating　or　experiencing　some　other
  bodily　delight。　Thus　spoke　Prodicus；　and　many　of　the　company　applauded
  his　words。
  Hippias　the　sage　spoke　next。　He　said：　All　of　you　who　are　here
  present　I　reckon　to　be　kinsmen　and　friends　and　fellow…citizens；　by
  nature　and　not　by　law；　for　by　nature　like　is　akin　to　like；　whereas　law
  is　the　tyrant　of　mankind；　and　often　compels　us　to　do　many　things　which
  are　against　nature。　How　great　would　be　the　disgrace　then；　if　we；　who
  know　the　nature　of　things；　and　are　the　wisest　of　the　Hellenes；　and
  as　such　are　met　together　in　this　city；　which　is　the　metropolis　of
  wisdom；　and　in　the　greatest　and　most　glorious　house　of　this　city；
  should　have　nothing　to　show　worthy　of　this　height　of　dignity；　but
  should　only　quarrel　with　one　another　like　the　meanest　of　mankind　I
  pray　and　advise　you；　Protagoras；　and　you；　Socrates；　to　agree　upon　a
  compromise。　Let　us　be　your　peacemakers。　And　do　not　you；　Socrates；
  aim　at　this　precise　and　extreme　brevity　in　discourse；　if　Protagoras
  objects；　but　loosen　and　let　go　the　reins　of　speech；　that　your　words
  may　be　grander　and　more　becoming　to　you。　Neither　do　you；　Protagoras；
  go　forth　on　the　gale　with　every　sail　set　out　of　sight　of　land　into
  an　ocean　of　words；　but　let　there　be　a　mean　observed　by　both　of　you。　Do
  as　I　say。　And　let　me　also　persuade　you　to　choose　an　arbiter　or
  overseer　or　president；　he　will　keep　watch　over　your　words　and　will
  prescribe　their　proper　length。
  This　proposal　was　received　by　the　company　with　universal　approval；
  Callias　said　that　he　would　not　let　me　off；　and　they　begged　me　to
  choose　an　arbiter。　But　I　said　that　to　choose　an　umpire　of　discourse
  would　be　unseemly；　for　if　the　person　chosen　was　inferior；　then　the
  inferior　or　worse　ought　not　to　preside　over　the　better；　or　if　he　was
  equal；　neither　would　that　be　well；　for　he　who　is　our　equal　will　do
  as　we　do；　and　what　will　be　the　use　of　choosing　him？　And　if　you　say；
  〃Let　us　have　a　better　then；〃…to　that　I　answer　that　you　cannot　have　any
  one　who　is　wiser　than　Protagoras。　And　if　you　choose　another　who　is　not
  really　better；　and　whom　you　only　say　is　better；　to　put　another　over
  him　as　though　he　were　an　inferior　person　would　be　an　unworthy
  reflection　on　him；　not　that；　as　far　as　I　am　concerned；　any
  reflection　is　of　much　consequence　to　me。　Let　me　tell　you　then　what　I
  will　do　in　order　that　the　conversation　and　discussion　may　go　on　as　you
  desire。　If　Protagoras　is　not　disposed　to　answer；　let　him　ask　and　I
  will　answer；　a