abound　…　here　are　the　temples　most　desecrate。　With　sickness　of　the
  heart　the　wanderer　will　flee　back　to　the　polluted　Paris　as　to　a　less
  odious　because　less　incongruous　sink　of　pollution。　But　if　the
  vicinity　of　the　city　is　so　beset　during　the　working　days　of　the　week；
  how　much　more　so　on　the　Sabbath！　It　is　now　especially　that；　released
  from　the　claims　of　labor；　or　deprived　of　the　customary　opportunities
  of　crime；　the　town　blackguard　seeks　the　precincts　of　the　town；　not
  through　love　of　the　rural；　which　in　his　heart　he　despises；　but　by　way
  of　escape　from　the　restraints　and　conventionalities　of　society。　He
  desires　less　the　fresh　air　and　the　green　trees；　than　the　utter
  license　of　the　country。　Here；　at　the　road…side　inn；　or　beneath　the
  foliage　of　the　woods；　he　indulges；　unchecked　by　any　eye　except　those
  of　his　boon　companions；　in　all　the　mad　excess　of　a　counterfeit
  hilarity　…　the　joint　offspring　of　liberty　and　of　rum。　I　say　nothing
  more　than　what　must　be　obvious　to　every　dispassionate　observer；　when
  I　repeat　that　the　circumstance　of　the　articles　in　question　having
  remained　undiscovered；　for　a　longer　period　…　than　from　one　Sunday　to
  another；　in　any　thicket　in　the　immediate　neighborhood　of　Paris；　is　to
  be　looked　upon　as　little　less　than　miraculous。
  〃But　there　are　not　wanting　other　grounds　for　the　suspicion　that　the
  articles　were　placed　in　the　thicket　with　the　view　of　diverting
  attention　from　the　real　scene　of　the　outrage。　And；　first；　let　me
  direct　your　notice　to　the　date　of　the　discovery　of　the　articles。
  Collate　this　with　the　date　of　the　fifth　extract　made　by　myself　from
  the　newspapers。　You　will　find　that　the　discovery　followed；　almost
  immediately；　the　urgent　communications　sent　to　the　evening　paper。
  These　communications；　although　various　and　apparently　from　various
  sources；　tended　all　to　the　same　point　…　viz。；　the　directing　of
  attention　to　a　gang　as　the　perpetrators　of　the　outrage；　and　to　the
  neighborhood　of　the　Barri鑢e　du　Roule　as　its　scene。　Now　here；　of
  course；　the　suspicion　is　not　that；　in　consequence　of　these
  communications；　or　of　the　public　attention　by　them　directed；　the
  articles　were　found　by　the　boys；　but　the　suspicion　might　and　may　well
  have　been；　that　the　articles　were　not　before　found　by　the　boys；　for
  the　reason　that　the　articles　had　not　before　been　in　the　thicket；
  having　been　deposited　there　only　at　so　late　a　period　as　at　the　date；
  or　shortly　prior　to　the　date　of　the　communications　by　the　guilty
  authors　of　these　communications　themselves。
  〃This　thicket　was　a　singular　…　an　exceedingly　singular　one。　It　was
  unusually　dense。　Within　its　naturally　walled　enclosure　were　three
  extraordinary　stones；　forming　a　seat　with　a　back　and　footstool。　And
  this　thicket；　so　full　of　a　natural　art；　was　in　the　immediate
  vicinity；　within　a　few　rods；　of　the　dwelling　of　Madame　Deluc；　whose
  boys　were　in　the　habit　of　closely　examining　the　shrubberies　about
  them　in　search　of　the　bark　of　the　sassafras。　Would　it　be　a　rash　wager
  …　a　wager　of　one　thousand　to　one　　that　a　day　never　passed　over　the
  heads　of　these　boys　without　finding　at　least　one　of　them　ensconced　in
  the　umbrageous　hall；　and　enthroned　upon　its　natural　throne？　Those　who
  would　hesitate　at　such　a　wager；　have　either　never　been　boys
  themselves；　or　have　forgotten　the　boyish　nature。　I　repeat　　it　is
  exceedingly　hard　to　comprehend　how　the　articles　could　have　remained
  in　this　thicket　undiscovered；　for　a　longer　period　than　one　or　two
  days；　and　that　thus　there　is　good　ground　for　suspicion；　in　spite　of
  the　dogmatic　ignorance　of　Le　Soleil；　that　they　were；　at　a
  comparatively　late　date；　deposited　where　found。
  〃But　there　are　still　other　and　stronger　reasons　for　believing　them　so
  deposited；　than　any　which　I　have　as　yet　urged。　And；　now；　let　me　beg
  your　notice　to　the　highly　artificial　arrangement　of　the　articles。　On
  the　upper　stone　lay　a　white　petticoat；　on　the　second　a　silk　scarf；
  scattered　around；　were　a　parasol；　gloves；　and　a　pocket…handkerchief
  bearing　the　name；　'Marie　Rog阾。'　Here　is　just　such　an　arrangement　as
  would　naturally　be　made　by　a　not　over…acute　person　wishing　to　dispose
  the　articles　naturally。　But　it　is　by　no　means　a　really　natural
  arrangement。　I　should　rather　have　looked　to　see　the　things　all　lying
  on　the　ground　and　trampled　under　foot。　In　the　narrow　limits　of　that
  bower；　it　would　have　been　scarcely　possible　that　the　petticoat　and
  scarf　should　have　retained　a　position　upon　the　stones；　when　subjected
  to　the　brushing　to　and　fro　of　many　struggling　persons。　'There　was
  evidence；'　it　is　said；　'of　a　struggle；　and　the　earth　was　trampled；
  the　bushes　were　broken；'　…　but　the　petticoat　and　the　scarf　are　found
  deposited　as　if　upon　shelves。　'The　pieces　of　the　frock　torn　out　by
  the　bushes　were　about　three　inches　wide　and　six　inches　long。　One　part
  was　the　hem　of　the　frock　and　it　had　been　mended。　They　looked　like
  strips　torn　off。'　Here；　inadvertently；　Le　Soleil　has　employed　an
  exceedingly　suspicious　phrase。　The　pieces；　as　described；　do　indeed
  'look　like　strips　torn　off；'　but　purposely　and　by　hand。　It　is　one　of
  the　rarest　of　accidents　that　a　piece　is　'torn　off；'　from　any　garment
  such　as　is　now　in　question；　by　the　agency　of　a　thorn。　From　the　very
  nature　of　such　fabrics；　a　thorn　or　nail　becoming　entangled　in　them；
  tears　them　rectangularly　…　divides　them　into　two　longitudinal　rents；
  at　right　angles　with　each　other；　and　meeting　at　an　apex　where　the
  thorn　enters　…　but　it　is　scarcely　possible　to　conceive　the　piece
  'torn　off。'　I　never　so　knew　it；　nor　did　you。　To　tear　a　piece　off　from
  such　fabric；　two　distinct　forces；　in　different　directions；　will　be；
  in　almost　every　case；　required。　If　there　be　two　edges　to　the　fabric　…
  if；　for　example；　it　be　a　pocket…　handkerchief；　and　it　is　desired　to
  tear　from　it　a　slip；　then；　and　then　only；　will　the　one　force　serve
  the　purpose。　But　in　the　present　case　the　question　is　of　a　dress；
  presenting　but　one　edge。　To　tear　a　piece　from　the　interior；　where　no
  edge　is　presented；　could　only　be　effected　by　a　miracle　through　the
  agency　of　thorns；　and　no　one　thorn　could　accomplish　it。　But；　even
  where　an　edge　is　presented；　two　thorns　will　be　necessary；　operating；
  the　one　in　two　distinct　directions；　and　the　other　in　one。　And　this　in
  the　supposition　that　the　edge　is　unhemmed。　If　hemmed；　the　matter　is
  nearly　out　of　the　question。　We　thus　see　the　numerous　and　great
  obstacles　in　the　way　of　pieces　being　'torn　off'　through　the　simple
  agency　of　'thorns；'　yet　we　are　required　to　believe　not　only　that　one
  piece　but　that　many　have　been　so　torn。　'And　one　part；'　too；　'was　the
  hem　of　the　frock！'　Another　piece　was　'part　of　the　skirt；　not　the
  hem；'　…　that　is　to　say；　was　torn　completely　out　through　the　agency　of
  thorns；　from　the　uncaged　interior　of　the　dress！　These；　I　say；　are
  things　which　one　may　well　be　pardoned　for　disbelieving；　yet；　taken
  collectedly；　they　form；　perhaps；　less　of　reasonable　ground　for
  suspicion；　than　the　one　startling　circumstance　of　the　articles'
  having　been　left　in　this　thicket　at　all；　by　any　murderers　who　had
  enough　precaution　to　think　of　removing　the　corpse。　You　will　not　have
  apprehended　me　rightly；　however；　if　you　suppose　it　my　design　to　deny
  this　thicket　as　the　scene　of　the　outrage。　There　might　have　been　a
  wrong　here；　or；　more　possibly；　an　accident　at　Madame　Deluc's。　But；　in
  fact；　this　is　a　point　of　minor　importance。　We　are　not　engaged　in　an
  attempt　to　discover　the　scene；　but　to　produce　the　perpetrators　of　the
  murder。　What　I　have　adduced；　notwithstanding　the　minuteness　with
  which　I　have　adduced　it；　has　been　with　the　view；　first；　to　show　the
  folly　of　the　positive　and　headlong　assertions　of　Le　Soleil；　but
  secondly　and　chiefly；　to　bring　you；　by　the　most　natural　route；　to　a
  further　contemplation　of　the　doubt　whether　this　assassination　has；　or
  has　not　been；　the　work　of　a　gang。
  〃We　will　resume　this　question　by　mere　allusion　to　the　revolting
  details　of　the　surgeon　examined　at　the　inquest。　It　is　only　necessary
  to　say　that　is　published　inferences；　in　regard　to　the　number　of
  ruffians；　have　been　properly　ridiculed　as　unjust　and　totally
  baseless；　by　all　the　reputable　anatomists　of　Paris。　Not　that　the
  matter　might　not　have　been　as　inferred；　but　that　there　was　no　ground
  for　the　inference：　…　was　there　not　much　for　another？
  〃Let　us　reflect　now　upon　'the　traces　of　a　struggle；'　and　let　me　ask
  what　these　traces　have　been　supposed　to　demonstrate。　A　gang。　But　do
  they　not　rather　demonstrate　the　absence　of　a　gang？　What　struggle
  could　have　taken　place　…　what　struggle　so　violent　and　so　enduring　as
  to　have　left　its　'traces'　in　all　directions　…　between　a　weak　and
  defenceless　girl　and　the　gang　of　ruffians　imagined？　The　silent　grasp
  of　a　few　rough　arms　and　all　would　have　been　over。　The　victim　must
  have　been　absolutely　passive　at　their　will。　You　will　here　bear　in
  mind　that　the　arguments　urged　against　the　thicket　as　the　scene；　are
  applicable　in　chief　part；　only　against　it　as　the　scene　of　an　outrage
  committed　by　more　than　a　single　individual。　If　we　imagine　but　one
  violator；　we　can　conceive；　and　thus　only　conceive；　the　struggle　of　so
  violent　and　so　obstinate　a　na