第 57 节
作者:嘟嘟      更新:2021-04-30 16:07      字数:9322
  upon malt might reduce the rent and profit of barley land。
  No tax can ever reduce; for any considerable time; the rate
  of profit in any particular trade which must always keep its
  level with other trades in the neighbourhood。 The present duties
  upon malt; beer; and ale do not affect the profits of the dealers
  in those commodities; who all get back the tax with an additional
  profit in the enhanced price of their goods。 A tax; indeed; may
  render the goods upon which it is imposed so dear as to diminish
  the consumption of them。 But the consumption of malt is in malt
  liquors; and a tax of eighteen shillings upon the quarter of malt
  could not well render those liquors dearer than the different
  taxes; amounting to twenty…four or twenty…five shillings; do at
  present。 Those liquors; on the contrary; would probably become
  cheaper; and the consumption of them would be more likely to
  increase than to diminish。
  It is not very easy to understand why it should be more
  difficult for the maltster to get back eighteen shillings in the
  advanced price of his malt than it is at present for the brewer
  to get back twenty…four or twenty…five; sometimes thirty;
  shillings in that of his liquor。 The maltster; indeed; instead of
  a tax of six shillings; would be obliged to advance one of
  eighteen shillings upon every quarter of malt。 But the brewer is
  at present obliged to advance a tax of twenty…four or
  twenty…five; sometimes thirty; shillings upon every quarter of
  malt which he brews。 It could not be more inconvenient for the
  maltster to advance a lighter tax than it is at present for the
  brewer to advance a heavier one。 The maltster doth not always
  keep in his granaries a stock of malt which it will require a
  longer time to dispose of than the stock of beer and ale which
  the brewer frequently keeps in his cellars。 The former;
  therefore; may frequently get the returns of his money as soon as
  the latter。 But whatever inconveniency might arise to the
  maltster from being obliged to advance a heavier tax; it could
  easily be remedied by granting him a few months' longer credit
  than is at present commonly given to the brewer。
  Nothing could reduce the rent and profit of barley land
  which did not reduce the demand for barley。 But a change of
  system which reduced the duties upon a quarter of malt brewed
  into beer and ale from twenty…four and twenty…five shillings to
  eighteen shillings would be more likely to increase than diminish
  that demand。 The rent and profit of barley land; besides; must
  always be nearly equal to those of other equally fertile and
  equally well…cultivated land。 If they were less; some part of the
  barley land would soon be turned to some other purpose; and if
  they were greater; more land would soon be turned to the raising
  of barley。 When the ordinary price of any particular produce of
  land is at what may be called a monopoly price; a tax upon it
  necessarily reduces the rent and profit of the land which grows
  it。 A tax upon the produce of those precious vineyards of which
  the wine falls so much short of the effectual demand that its
  price is always above the natural proportion to that of the
  produce of other equally fertile and equally well cultivated land
  would necessarily reduce the rent and profit of those vineyards。
  The price of the wines being already the highest that could be
  got for the quantity commonly sent to market; it could not be
  raised higher without diminishing that quantity; and the quantity
  could not be diminished without still greater loss; because the
  lands could not be turned to any other equally valuable produce。
  The whole weight of the tax; therefore; would fall upon the rent
  and profit… properly upon the rent of the vineyard。 When it has
  been proposed to lay any new tax upon sugar; our sugar planters
  have frequently complained that the whole weight of such taxes
  fell; not upon the consumer; but upon the producer; they never
  having been able to raise the price of their sugar after the tax
  higher than it was before。 The price had; it seems; before the
  tax been a monopoly price; and the argument adduced to show that
  sugar was an improper subject of taxation demonstrated; perhaps;
  that it was a proper one; the gains of monopolists; whenever they
  can be come at; being certainly of all subjects the most proper。
  But the ordinary price of barley has never been a monopoly price;
  and the rent and profit of barley land have never been above
  their natural proportion to those of other equally fertile and
  equally well…cultivated land。 The different taxes which have been
  imposed upon malt; beer; and ale have never lowered the price of
  barley; have never reduced the rent and profit of barley land。
  The price of malt to the brewer has constantly risen in
  proportion to the taxes imposed upon it; and those taxes;
  together with the different duties upon beer and ale; have
  constantly either raised the price; or what comes to the same
  thing; reduced the quality of those commodities to the consumer。
  The final payment of those taxes has fallen constantly upon the
  consumer; and not upon the producer。
  The only people likely to suffer by the change of system
  here proposed are those who brew for their own private use。 But
  the exemption which this superior rank of people at present enjoy
  from very heavy taxes which are paid by the poor labourer and
  artificer is surely most unjust and unequal; and ought to be
  taken away; even though this change was never to take place。 It
  has probably been the interest of this superior order of people;
  however; which has hitherto prevented a change of system that
  could not well fail both to increase the revenue and to relieve
  the people。
  Besides such duties as those of customs and excise above
  mentioned; there are several others which affect the price of
  goods more unequally and more indirectly。 Of this kind are the
  duties which in French are called Peages; which in old Saxon
  times were called Duties of Passage; and which seem to have been
  originally established for the same purpose as our turnpike
  tolls; or the tolls upon our canals and navigable rivers; for the
  maintenance of the road or of the navigation。 Those duties; when
  applied to such purposes; are most properly imposed according to
  the bulk or weight of the goods。 As they were originally local
  and provincial duties; applicable to local and provincial
  purposes; the administration of them was in most cases entrusted
  to the particular town; parish; or lordship in which they were
  levied; such communities being in some way or other supposed to
  be accountable for the application。 The sovereign; who is
  altogether unaccountable; has in many countries assumed to
  himself the administration of those duties; and though he has in
  most cases enhanced very much the duty; he has in many entirely
  neglected the application。 If the turnpike tolls of Great Britain
  should ever become one of the resources of government; we may
  learn; by the example of many other nations; what would probably
  be the consequence。 Such tolls are no doubt finally paid by the
  consumer; but the consumer is not taxed in proportion to his
  expense when he pays; not according to the value; but according
  to the bulk or weight of what he consumes。 When such duties are
  imposed; not according to the bulk or weight; but according to
  the supposed value of the goods; they become properly a sort of
  inland customs or excises which obstruct very much the most
  important of all branches of commerce; the interior commerce of
  the country。
  In some small states duties similar to those passage duties
  are imposed upon goods carried across the territory; either by
  land or by water; from one foreign country to another。 These are
  in some countries called transit…duties。 Some of the little
  Italian states which are situated upon the Po and the rivers
  which run into it derive some revenue from duties of this kind
  which are paid altogether by foreigners; and which; perhaps; are
  the only duties that one state can impose upon the subjects of
  another without obstructing in any respect the industry or
  commerce of its own。 The most important transit…duty in the world
  is that levied by the King of Denmark upon all merchant ships
  which pass through the Sound。
  Such taxes upon luxuries as the greater part of the duties
  of customs and excise; though they all fall indifferently upon
  every different species of revenue; and are paid finally; or
  without any retribution; by whoever consumes the commodities upon
  which they are imposed; yet they do not always fall equally or
  proportionably upon the revenue of every individual。 As every
  man's humour regulates the degree of his consumption; every man
  contributes rather according to his humour than in proportion to
  his revenue; the profuse contribute more; the parsimonious less;
  than their proper proportion。 During the minority of a man of
  great fortun