第 56 节
作者:匆匆      更新:2021-02-27 02:11      字数:9322
  to have an objectivity the same as itself; that is; to have itself for object。 The part of logic that
  treats of this concrete side does not belong to applied logic as such; if it did; then every science
  would have to be dragged into logic; for each is an applied logic in so far as it consists in
  apprehending its subject matter in forms of thought and the Notion。 The subjective Notion has
  presuppositions which present themselves in psychological; anthropological and other forms。 But
  to logic belong only the presuppositions of the pure Notion in so far as they have the form of pure
  thoughts; of abstract essentialities; that is; the determinations of being and essence。 Similarly; in
  respect of cognition; the Notion's apprehension of itself; logic will not deal with other shapes of its
  presupposition but only with that which is itself Idea; this latter; however; necessarily falls to be
  dealt with in logic。 Now this presupposition is the immediate Idea; for since cognition is the
  Notion in so far as this is for itself but as a subjectivity is in relation to an objectivity; the Notion is
  related to the Idea as presupposed or immediate Idea。 But the immediate Idea is life。
  To this extent the necessity of treating of the Idea of life in logic would be based on the necessity;
  otherwise recognised; too; of treating here of the concrete Notion of cognition。 But this Idea has
  come upon the scene through the Notion's own necessity; the Idea; that which is true in and for
  itself; is essentially the subject matter of logic; since it is at first to be considered in its immediacy; it
  must be apprehended and cognised in this determinateness in which it is life; in order that its
  treatment shall not be an empty affair devoid of determinate content。 All that we need perhaps to
  remark is how far the logical view of life differs from any other scientific view of it; this is not the
  place; however; to concern ourselves with how life is treated in the unphilosophical sciences; but
  only with differentiating logical life as pure Idea from natural life which is dealt with in the
  philosophy of nature; and from life in so far as it stands in connection with spirit。 The former of
  these; as the life of nature; is life as projected into the externality of existence and having its
  condition in inorganic nature; and where the moments of the Idea are a multiplicity of actual
  formations。 Life in the Idea is without such presuppositions which are in the form of shapes of
  actuality; its presupposition is the Notion as we have considered it; on the one hand as subjective;
  on the other hand as objective。 In nature life appears as the highest stage; a stage that nature's
  externality attains by withdrawing into itself and sublating itself in subjectivity。 In Logic it is simple
  inwardness 'Insichsein'; which in the Idea of life has attained an externality that genuinely
  corresponds to it; the Notion that earlier appeared on the scene as subjective Notion is the soul of
  life itself; it is the urge that mediates for itself its reality throughout objectivity。 Nature; having
  reached this Idea from the starting point of its externality; transcends itself; its end does not appear
  as its beginning; but as its limit; in which it sublates itself。 Similarly; in the Idea of life the moments
  of its reality do not receive the shape of external actuality but remain enclosed within the form of
  the Notion。
  In spirit; however; life appears partly as opposed to it; partly as posited as at one with it; this
  unity being reborn as the pure offspring of spirit。 For here life is to be taken generally in its proper
  sense as natural life; for what is called the life of spirit as spirit; is its peculiar nature that stands
  opposed to mere life; just as we speak; too; of the nature of spirit; although spirit is not a natural
  being and is rather the opposite of nature。 Life as such; then; is for spirit partly a means; and as
  such spirit opposes it to itself; partly spirit is a living individual and life is its body; and again; this
  unity of spirit with its living corporeality is born from spirit itself as an ideal。 None of these
  relations to spirit concerns logical life and life is to be considered here neither as instrument
  'Mittel' of a spirit; nor as a moment of the ideal and of beauty。 In both cases; as natural life and
  as life standing in relation with spirit; life possesses a determinateness of its externality; in the
  first case through its presuppositions which are other formations of nature; in the second case
  through the ends and the activity of spirit。 The Idea of life by itself is free from the former
  presupposed and conditioning objectivity as well as from relation to the latter subjectivity。
  Life; considered now more closely in its Idea; is in and for itself absolute universality; the
  objectivity that it possesses is permeated throughout by the Notion and has the Notion alone for
  substance。 What is distinguished as part; or in accordance with some other external reflection; has
  within itself the whole Notion; the Notion is the omnipresent soul in it; which remains simple
  self…relation and remains a one in the multiplicity belonging to objective being。 This multiplicity; as
  self…external objectivity; has an indifferent subsistence; which in space and time; if these could
  already be mentioned here; is a mutual externality of wholly diverse and self…subsistent elements。
  But in life externality is at the same time present as the simple determinateness of its Notion; thus
  the soul is an omnipresent outpouring of itself into this multiplicity and at the same remains
  absolutely the simple oneness of the concrete Notion with itself。 The thinking that clings to the
  determinations of the relationships of reflection and of the formal Notion; when it comes to
  consider life; this unity of its Notion in the externality of objectivity; in the absolute multiplicity of
  atomistic matter; finds all its thoughts without exception are of no avail; the omnipresence of the
  simple in manifold externality is for reflection an absolute contradiction; and as reflection must at
  the same time apprehend this omnipresence from its perception of life and therefore admit the
  actuality of this Idea; it is an incomprehensible mystery for it; because it does not grasp the
  Notion; and the Notion as the substance of life。 This simple life; however; is not only omnipresent;
  it is absolutely the subsistence and immanent substance of its objectivity; but as subjective
  substance it is the urge; and moreover t ' he specific urge; of the particular difference; and no
  less essentially the one and universal urge of the specialised difference that reduces this its
  particularisation into unity and maintains it therein。 It is only as this negative unity of its objectivity
  and particularisation that life is a self…related life that is for itself; a soul。 As such it is essentially an
  individual; which relates itself to objectivity as to an other; to a non…living nature。
  Consequently the original judgment of life consists in this; that it detaches itself as an individual
  subject from objectivity; and in constituting itself the negative unity of the Notion; makes the
  presupposition of an immediate objectivity。
  Life is therefore first to be considered as a living individual that is for itself the subjective totality
  and is presupposed as indifferent to an objectivity that confronts it as indifferent。
  Secondly; it is the life process; the process of sublating its presupposition; positing as negative the
  objectivity that is indifferent to it and actualising itself as that objectivity's power and negative unity。
  By so doing it makes itself into the universal that is the unity of itself and its other。
  Hence life is thirdly the genus process; the process of sublating its individualisation and relating
  itself to its objective existence as to itself。 Accordingly; this process is on the one hand the return
  to its Notion and the repetition of the first diremption; the becoming of a new individuality and the
  death of the first; immediate one; but on the other hand; the Notion of life that has withdrawn
  into itself is the becoming of the Notion that is in relationship with itself and exists universally and
  freely for itself…the transition into cognition。
  A The Living Individual
  B The Life Process
  C The Genus 'Kind'
  Chapter 2 The Idea of Cognition
  Life is the immediate Idea; or the Idea as its Notion not yet realised in its own self。 In its
  judgement; the Idea is cognition in general。
  The Notion is; as Notion; for itself in so far as it freely exists as abstract universality or as genus。
  As such; it is its pure self…identity; which inwardly differentiates itself in such a manner that the
  differentiated moment is not an objectivity; but is likewise liberated into subjectivity or the form of
  simple selflikeness; and hence the object of the Notion is the Notion itself。 Its reality in general is
  the form of its determinate being and the point of interest is the determination this form; on this
  determination rests the difference between what the Notion is in itself or as subjective and what
  it is when submerged in objectivity; and then