第 15 节
作者:闲来一看      更新:2022-11-23 12:13      字数:9317
  genus; and to integrate itself through union with the other。 Through this mediation the concrete
  generality joins together with itself and yields individual reality。
  § 291。
  This product is the negative identity of the differentiated individuals and is; as realised genus; an
  asexual life。 But on the side of nature the product is only implicitly this genus and distinct from the
  individuals which have perished in it。 It is thus itself an individual which has in itself the
  determination of the same difference and transiency。 But at the same time; in this new life in which
  individuality is suspended; the same subjectivity is retained positively and in this; its return into itself
  the genus as such has emerged for itself in reality; and has become a higher being than nature。
  § 292。
  Underlying the various orders and structures of the animals lies the general type of the animal
  determined by the concept; which nature manifests partly in the different steps of its development
  from the simplest organisation to the most complete; in which it is the instrument of the spirit; and
  partly in the different circumstances and conditions of elementary nature。
  The concept of the animal has the concept itself as its essence; because it is the actuality of the
  idea of life。 The nature of its generality enables it to have a simpler and more developed existence
  which corresponds more or less to it。 Thus the concept in its determinacy can not be grasped from
  existence itself。 The classes; in which it emerges developed and manifested completely in its
  moments; appear as a particular existence in contrast to the others; and can also have a bad
  existence in them。 The concept is already presupposed for the judgment of whether the existence
  is bad。 If; as usual; existence is presupposed; then it will undoubtedly be used in an empirical way
  to reach no fixed determination; and all particular attributes will also seem to be lacking。
  Acephalous animals; for example; have been used as proof that people can live without brains。
  Zoology; like the natural sciences generally; has concerned itself primarily with discovering more
  certain and simpler signs for subjective cognition。 Only since this goal of an 〃artificial〃 system for
  classifying animals was given up has the way been opened for a broader view; and among the
  empirical sciences there is hardly one which in recent times has expanded as much as zoology;
  particularly through its auxiliary science of comparative anatomy。 This expansion has not occurred
  solely in the sense of more observations; for none of the sciences lacks these; but in the sense of
  arranging its material to accord with reason。
  Partly it is the habits of individual animals; viewed as a coherent whole determining the
  construction of every part; which have become the main point; so that the great founder of
  comparative anatomy; Cuvier; could boast that he could recognise the essential nature of the entire
  animal from a single bone。 Partly it is that the general type of the animal has been traced in the
  various; still apparently incomplete and disparate forms; and its importance recognised in the
  hardly noticed suggestion; as well as in the mixture of organs and functions; and in this way has
  been raised above and beyond its particularity into its generality。 A primary feature of this method
  is the recognition of how nature shapes and adapts this organism to the particular element in which
  it is placed; an environment which can also be one particular species of plant or another of animal。
  It is due to the immediacy of the idea of life that the concept; whether or not it is only determined
  in and for itself does not exist as such in life。 Its existence is therefore subjected to the manifold
  conditions and circumstances of external nature; and can appear in the most inadequate forms。
  The fecundity of the earth causes life to break out in every way。 Even perhaps less than the other
  spheres of nature; therefore; can the animal world present in itself an independent; rational system
  of organisation; or retain a hold on forms determined by the concept and preserve them against the
  imperfection and mixture of conditions; from confusion; degeneration; and transitional forms。 This
  weakness of the concept; which exists in the animal though not in its fixed; independent freedom;
  entirely subjects even the genus to the changes that are shared by the life of the animal。 And the
  environment of external contingency in which the animal must live exercises perpetual violence
  against the individual。 Hence the life of the animal seems in general to be sick; and the animal's
  feeling seems to be insecure; anxious; and unhappy。
  § 293。
  Due to the externality of its existence; the individual organism can not accord with its
  determination。 It finds itself in a state of disease when one of its systems or organs; stimulated to
  conflict with an organic power; establishes itself for itself and persists in its particular activity
  against the activity of the whole。 For the fluidity and pervasive process of the activity is thus
  obstructed。
  § 294。
  The characteristic manifestation of disease is; thus; when the identity of the entire organic concept;
  as the successive course of life's movement through its different moments; sensibility; irritability;
  and reproduction; presents itself as fever。 This fever is to the same extent both the isolated activity
  in opposition to the course of totality; and the effort towards and beginning of healing。
  § 295。
  Medicine provokes the organism to remove the inorganic power with which the activity of the
  individual organ or system is entangled and thereby isolated。 Essentially; however; the irritation of
  the formal activity of the particular organ or system is suspended; and its fluidity is restored within
  the whole。 The medicine achieves this as an irritant; but one which is even more difficult to
  assimilate and to overcome; and against which the organism is compelled to exert its entire
  strength。 While it acts in this way against an external entity; the organism steps out of the limitation
  with which it had become identical and in which it had become involved。
  Medication must in general be viewed as an indigestible substance。 But indigestibility is only a
  relative category; though not in the vague sense in which it is usually taken; as if it really meant
  something easily digestible by weaker constitutions。 On the contrary; such an easily digestible
  substance is indigestible for stronger individuals。 The true relativity; that of the concept; which has
  its actuality in life; consists; when expressed in the quantitative terms which count as valid here; in
  homogeneity being greater; the more the opposed terms are intrinsically self…subsistent。 The
  highest qualitative form of relativity in the living organism has manifested itself as the sexual relation;
  in which independent individualities are identical to each other。
  For the lower forms of animal life; which have not achieved a difference within themselves; the
  digestible substance is the substance without individuality; such as water for plants。 For children;
  the digestible substance is partly the completely homogeneous animal lymph; mother's milk; a
  substance which is already digested or rather has further differentiated within itself and partly the
  least individualised of mixed substances。 Substances of this kind; on the other hand; are
  indigestible for stronger natures。 These natures digest more easily individualised animal substances;
  or plant juices which sunlight has matured to a more powerful self and are therefore 〃spirituous;〃
  instead of for example; the vegetable products still in their merely neutral colour and closer to the
  chemical process proper。 Through this more intensive selfhood the former substances form an
  even stronger contrast; but for that very reason they are more homogeneous irritants。 Taken
  together; medications are negative irritants; poisons; a stimulant and at the same time an
  indigestible substance; to the extent that the organism alienated from itself in disease must gather
  up its strength; turn against the medication as an external; foreign body; and thereby achieve again
  the self…feeling of its individuality。
  But Brownianism; regarded as a complete system of medicine; is merely an empty formalism;
  especially in its determination of diseases and the actions of medications according to sthenic or
  asthenic body types; the latter further divided into direct and indirect asthenia。 Brown's theory is;
  moreover; too often limited by formulations derived from the natural sciences; such as his recourse
  to the factors of carbon and nitrogen; oxygen and hydrogen as explanations; or magnetic;
  electrical; and chemical moments。 Nevertheless; his theory did have two important consequences:
  through him; the view of merely particular and specific issues; both in diseases and medications;
  was expanded to the general in them as essential elements; and through his opposition to the
  p