＇353＇　Above；　p。　445。
  The　time　has　now　come　for　this　attempt。　　Who　says　〃hypothesis〃
  renounces　the　ambition　to　be　coercive　in　his　arguments。　The　most
  I　can　do　is；　accordingly；　to　offer　something　that　may　fit　the
  facts　so　easily　that　your　scientific　logic　will　find　no　plausible
  pretext　for　vetoing　your　impulse　to　welcome　it　as　true。
  The　〃more；〃　as　we　called　it；　and　the　meaning　of　our　〃union〃　with
  it；　form　the　nucleus　of　our　inquiry。　　Into　what　definite
  description　can　these　words　be　translated；　and　for　what　definite
  facts　do　they　stand？　　It　would　never　do　for　us　to　place　ourselves
  offhand　at　the　position　of　a　particular　theology；　the　Christian
  theology；　for　example；　and　proceed　immediately　to　define　the
  〃more〃　as　Jehovah；　and　the　〃union〃　as　his　imputation　to　us　of　the
  righteousness　of　Christ。　　That　would　be　unfair　to　other
  religions；　and；　from　our　present　standpoint　at　least；　would　be　an
  over…belief。
  We　must　begin　by　using　less　particularized　terms；　and；　since　one
  of　the　duties　of　the　science　of　religions　is　to　keep　religion　in
  connection　with　the　rest　of　science；　we　shall　do　well　to　seek
  first　of　all　a　way　of　describing　the　〃more；〃　which　psychologists
  may　also　recognize　as　real。　　The　subconscious　self　is　nowadays　a
  well…accredited　psychological　entity；　and　I　believe　that　in　it　we
  have　exactly　the　mediating　term　required。　　Apart　from　all
  religious　considerations；　there　is　actually　and　literally　more
  life　in　our　total　soul　than　we　are　at　any　time　aware　of。　　The
  exploration　of　the　transmarginal　field　has　hardly　yet　been
  seriously　undertaken；　but　what　Mr。　Myers　said　in　1892　in　his
  essay　on　the　Subliminal　Consciousness＇354＇　is　as　true　as　when　it
  was　first　written：　　〃Each　of　us　is　in　reality　an　abiding
  psychical　entity　far　more　extensive　than　he　knowsan
  individuality　which　can　never　express　itself　completely　through
  any　corporeal　manifestation。　　The　Self　manifests　through　the
  organism；　but　there　is　always　some　part　of　the　Self　unmanifested；
  and　always；　as　it　seems；　some　power　of　organic　expression　in
  abeyance　or　reserve。〃＇355＇　　Much　of　the　content　of　this　larger
  background　against　which　our　conscious　being　stands　out　in　relief
  is　insignificant。　　Imperfect　memories；　silly　jingles；　inhibitive
  timidities；　〃dissolutive〃　phenomena　of　various　sorts；　as　Myers
  calls　them；　enters　into　it　for　a　large　part。　　But　in　it　many　of
  the　performances　of　genius　seem　also　to　have　their　origin；　and　in
  our　study　of　conversion；　of　mystical　experiences；　and　of　prayer；
  we　have　seen　how　striking　a　part　invasions　from　this　region　play
  in　the　religious　life。
  ＇354＇　Proceedings　of　the　Society　for　Psychical　Research；　vol。
  vii。　p。　305。　For　a　full　statement　of　Mr。　Myers's　views；　I　may
  refer　to　his　posthumous　work；　〃Human　Personality　in　the　Light　of
  Recent　Research；〃　which　is　already　announced　by　Messrs。
  Longmans；　Green　&　Co。　as　being　in　press。　　Mr。　Myers　for　the
  first　time　proposed　as　a　general　psychological　problem　the
  exploration　of　the　subliminal　region　of　consciousness　throughout
  its　whole　extent；　and　made　the　first　methodical　steps　in　its
  topography　by　treating　as　a　natural　series　a　mass　of　subliminal
  facts　hitherto　considered　only　as　curious　isolated　facts　and
  subjecting　them　to　a　systematized　nomenclature。　　How　important
  this　exploration　will　prove；　future　work　upon　the　path　which
  Myers　has　opened　can　alone　show。　　compare　my　paper：　　〃Frederic
  Myers's　services　to　Psychology；〃　in　the　said　Proceedings；　part
  xlii。；　May；　1901。
  ＇355＇　Compare　the　inventory　given　above　on　pp。　472…4；　and　also
  what　is　said　of　the　subconscious　self　on　pp。　228…231；　235…236。
  Let　me　then　propose；　as　an　hypothesis；　that　whatever　it　may　be　on
  its　FARTHER　side；　the　〃more〃　with　which　in　religious　experience
  we　feel　ourselves　connected　is　on　its　HITHER　side　the
  subconscious　continuation　of　our　conscious　life。　Starting　thus
  with　a　recognized　psychological　fact　as　our　basis；　we　seem　to
  preserve　a　contact　with　〃science〃　which　the　ordinary　theologian
  lacks。　　At　the　same　time　the　theologian's　contention　that　the
  religious　man　is　moved　by　an　external　power　is　vindicated；　for　it
  is　one　of　the　peculiarities　of　invasions　from　the　subconscious
  region　to　take　on　objective　appearances；　and　to　suggest　to　the
  Subject　an　external　control。　　In　the　religious　life　the　control
  is　felt　as　〃higher〃；　but　since　on　our　hypothesis　it　is　primarily
  the　higher　faculties　of　our　own　hidden　mind　which　are
  controlling；　the　sense　of　union　with　the　power　beyond　us　is　a
  sense　of　something；　not　merely　apparently；　but　literally　true。
  This　doorway　into　the　subject　seems　to　me　the　best　one　for　a
  science　of　religions；　for　it　mediates　between　a　number　of
  different　points　of　view。　　Yet　it　is　only　a　doorway；　and
  difficulties　present　themselves　as　soon　as　we　step　through　it；
  and　ask　how　far　our　transmarginal　consciousness　carries　us　if　we
  follow　it　on　its　remoter　side。　　Here　the　over…beliefs　begin：
  here　mysticism　and　the　conversion…rapture　and　Vedantism　and
  transcendental　idealism　bring　in　their　monistic
  interpretations＇356＇　and　tell　us　that　the　finite　self　rejoins　the
  absolute　self；　for　it　was　always　one　with　God　and　identical　with
  the　soul　of　the　world。＇357＇　　Here　the　prophets　of　all　the
  different　religions　come　with　their　visions；　voices；　raptures；
  and　other　openings；　supposed　by　each　to　authenticate　his　own
  peculiar　faith。
  ＇356＇　Compare　above；　pp。　410　ff。
  ＇357＇　One　more　expression　of　this　belief；　to　increase　the
  reader's　familiarity　with　the　notion　of　it：
  〃If　this　room　is　full　of　darkness　for　thousands　of　years；　and　you
  come　in　and　begin　to　weep　and　wail；　'Oh；　the　darkness；'　will　the
  darkness　vanish？　　Bring　the　light　in；　strike　a　match；　and　light
  comes　in　a　moment。　　So　what　good　will　it　do　you　to　think　all　your
  lives；　'Oh；　I　have　done　evil；　I　have　made　many　mistakes'？　　It
  requires　no　ghost　to　tell　us　that。　　Bring　in　the　light；　and　the
  evil　goes　in　a　moment。　　Strengthen　the　real　nature；　build　up
  yourselves；　the　effulgent；　the　resplendent；　the　ever　pure；　call
  that　up　in　every　one　whom　you　see。　　I　wish　that　every　one　of　us
  had　come　to　such　a　state　that　even　when　we　see　the　vilest　of
  human　beings　we　can　see　the　God　within；　and　instead　of
  condemning；　say；　'Rise；　thou　effulgent　One；　rise　thou　who　art
  always　pure；　rise　thou　birthless　and　deathless；　rise　almighty；
  and　manifest　your　nature。'　。　。　。　This　is　the　highest　prayer　that
  the　Advaita　teaches。　　This　is　the　one　prayer：　　remembering　our
  nature。〃。　。　。　〃Why　does　man　go　out　to　look　for　a　God？　。　。　。　It　is
  your　own　heart　beating；　and　you　did　not　know；　you　were　mistaking
  it　for　something　external。　　He；　nearest　of　the　near；　my　own　self；
  the　reality　of　my　own　life；　my　body　and　my　soul。I　am　Thee　and
  Thou　art　Me。　　That　is　your　own　nature。　　Assert　it；　manifest　it。
  Not　to　become　pure；　you　are　pure　already。　　You　are　not　to　be
  perfect；　you　are　that　already。　　Every　good　thought　which　you
  think　or　act　upon　is　simply　tearing　the　veil；　as　it　were；　and　the
  purity；　the　Infinity；　the　God　behind；　manifests　itselfthe
  eternal　Subject　of　everything；　the　eternal　Witness　in　this
  universe；　your　own　Self。　　Knowledge　is；　as　it　were；　a　lower　step；
  a　degradation。　　We　are　It　already；　how　to　know　It？〃　　Swami
  Viverananda：　Addresses；　No。　XII。；　Practical　Vedanta；　part　iv。　pp。
  172；　174；　London；　1897；　and　Lectures；　The　Real　and　the　Apparent
  Man；　p。　24；　abridged。
  Those　of　us　who　are　not　personally　favored　with　such　specific
  revelations　must　stand　outside　of　them　altogether　and；　for　the
  present　at　least；　decide　that；　since　they　corroborate
  incompatible　theological　doctrines；　they　neutralize　one　another
  and　leave　no　fixed　results。　　If　we　follow　any　one　of　them；　or　if
  we　follow　philosophical　theory　and　embrace　monistic　pantheism　on
  non…mystical　grounds；　we　do　so　in　the　exercise　of　our　individual
  freedom；　and　build　out　our　religion　in　the　way　most　congruous
  with　our　personal　susceptibilities。　　Among　these　susceptibilities
  intellectual　ones　play　a　decisive　part。　　Although　the　religious
  question　is　primarily　a　question　of　life；　of　living　or　not　living
  in　the　higher　union　which　opens　itself　to　us　as　a　gift；　yet　the
  spiritual　excitement　in　which　the　gift　appears　a　real　one　will
  often　fail　to　be　aroused　in　an　individual　until　certain
  particular　intellectual　beliefs