第 6 节
作者:笑傲网络      更新:2024-04-09 19:52      字数:9321
  no knowledge is commended in the Bible save that which is necessary
  for enabling all men to obey God in the manner stated; and without which
  they would become rebellious; or without the discipline of obedience。
  (11) Other speculative questions; which have no direct bearing on this
  object; or are concerned with the knowledge of natural events; do not affect
  Scripture; and should be entirely separated from religion。
  (12) Now; though everyone; as we have said; is now quite able to see this
  truth for himself; I should nevertheless wish; considering that the whole of
  Religion depends thereon; to explain the entire question more accurately and
  clearly。 (13) To this end I must first prove that the intellectual
  or accurate knowledge of God is not a gift; bestowed upon all good men
  like obedience; and; further; that the knowledge of God; required by Him
  through His prophets from everyone without exception; as needful to be
  known; is simply a knowledge of His Divine justice and charity。 (14) Both
  these points are easily proved from Scripture。 (15) The first plainly
  follows from Exodus vi:2; where God; in order to show the singular grace
  bestowed upon Moses; says to him: 〃And I appeared unto Abraham; unto Isaac;
  and unto Jacob by the name of El Sadai (A。 V。 God Almighty); but by my name
  Jehovah was I not known to them〃 … for the better understanding of which
  passage I may remark that El Sadai; in Hebrew; signifies the God who
  suffices; in that He gives to every man that which suffices for him; and;
  although Sadai is often used by itself; to signify God; we cannot doubt that
  the word El (God; {power; might}) is everywhere understood。 (16)
  Furthermore; we must note that Jehovah is the only word found in Scripture
  with the meaning of the absolute essence of God; without reference to
  created things。 (17) The Jews maintain; for this reason; that this is;
  strictly speaking; the only name of God; that the rest of the words used are
  merely titles; and; in truth; the other names of God; whether they be
  substantives or adjectives; are merely attributive; and belong to Him; in
  so far as He is conceived of in relation to created things; or manifested
  through them。 (18) Thus El; or Eloah; signifies powerful; as is well known;
  and only applies to God in respect to His supremacy; as when we call Paul an
  apostle; the faculties of his power are set forth in an accompanying
  adjective; as El; great; awful; just; merciful; &c。; or else all are
  understood at once by the use of El in the plural number; with a singular
  signification; an expression frequently adopted in Scripture。
  (19) Now; as God tells Moses that He was not known to the patriarchs by the
  name of Jehovah; it follows that they were not cognizant of any attribute of
  God which expresses His absolute essence; but only of His deeds and promises
  that is; of His power; as manifested in visible things。 (20) God does not
  thus speak to Moses in order to accuse the patriarchs of infidelity; but;
  on the contrary; as a means of extolling their belief and faith; inasmuch
  as; though they possessed no extraordinary knowledge of God (such as
  Moses had); they yet accepted His promises as fixed and certain; whereas
  Moses; though his thoughts about God were more exalted; nevertheless doubted
  about the Divine promises; and complained to God that; instead of the
  promised deliverance; the prospects of the Israelites had darkened。
  (21) As the patriarchs did not know the distinctive name of God; and as God
  mentions the fact to Moses; in praise of their faith and single…heartedness;
  and in contrast to the extraordinary grace granted to Moses; it follows; as
  we stated at first; that men are not bound by; decree to have knowledge of
  the attributes of God; such knowledge being only granted to a few of the
  faithful: it is hardly worth while to quote further examples from Scripture;
  for everyone must recognize that knowledge of God is not equal among all
  good men。 (22) Moreover; a man cannot be ordered to be wise any more than he
  can be ordered to live and exist。 (23) Men; women; and children are all
  alike able to obey by; commandment; but not to be wise。 If any tell us that
  it is not necessary to understand the Divine attributes; but that we must
  believe them simply; without proof; he is plainly; trifling。 (24) For what
  is invisible and can only; be perceived by the mind; cannot be apprehended
  by any; other means than proofs; if these are absent the object remains
  ungrasped; the repetition of what has been heard on such subjects no more
  indicates or attains to their meaning than the words of a parrot or a puppet
  speaking without sense or signification。
  (25) Before I proceed I ought to explain how it comes that we are often told
  in Genesis that the patriarchs preached in the name of Jehovah; this being
  in plain contradiction to the text above quoted。 (26) A reference to what
  was said in Chap。 VIII。 will readily explain the difficulty。 (27) It was
  there shown that the writer of the Pentateuch did not always speak of things
  and places by the names they bore in the times of which he was writing; but
  by the names best known to his contemporaries。 (28) God is thus said in the
  Pentateuch to have been preached by the patriarchs under the name of
  Jehovah; not because such was the name by which the patriarchs knew
  Him; but because this name was the one most reverenced by the Jews。
  (29) This point; I say; must necessarily be noticed; for in Exodus it is
  expressly stated that God was not known to the patriarchs by this name; and
  in chap。 iii:13; it is said that Moses desired to know the name of God。 (30)
  Now; if this name had been already known it would have been known to Moses。
  (31) We must therefore draw the conclusion indicated; namely; that the
  faithful patriarchs did not know this name of God; and that the knowledge of
  God is bestowed and not commanded by the Deity。
  (32) It is now time to pass on to our second point; and show that God
  through His prophets required from men no other knowledge of Himself than is
  contained in a knowledge of His justice and charity … that is; of attributes
  which a certain manner of life will enable men to imitate。 (33) Jeremiah
  states this in so many words (xxii:15; 16): 〃Did not thy father eat; and
  drink; and do judgment and justice? and then it was well with him。 (34) He
  judged the cause of the poor and needy; then it was well with him: was not
  this to know Me ? saith the Lord。〃 (35) The words in chap。 ix:24 of the same
  book are equally; clear。 (36) 〃But let him that glorieth glory in this; that
  he understandeth and knoweth Me; that I am the Lord which exercise loving…
  kindness; judgment; and righteousness in the earth; for in these things I
  delight; saith the Lord。〃 (37) The same doctrine maybe gathered from Exod。
  xxxiv:6; where God revealed to Moses only; those of His attributes which
  display the Divine justice and charity。 (38) Lastly; we may call attention
  to a passage in John which we shall discuss at more length hereafter; the
  Apostle explains the nature of God (inasmuch as no one has beheld Him)
  through charity only; and concludes that he who possesses charity possesses;
  and in very; truth knows God。
  (39) We have thus seen that Moses; Jeremiah; and John sum up in a very short
  compass the knowledge of God needful for all; and that they state it to
  consist in exactly what we said; namely; that God is supremely just; and
  supremely merciful … in other words; the one perfect pattern of the true
  life。 (40) We may add that Scripture nowhere gives an express definition of
  God; and does not point out any other of His attributes which should be
  apprehended save these; nor does it in set terms praise any others。
  (41) Wherefore we may draw the general conclusion that an intellectual
  knowledge of God; which takes cognizance of His nature in so far as it
  actually is; and which cannot by any manner of living be imitated by mankind
  or followed as an example; has no bearing whatever on true rules of conduct;
  on faith; or on revealed religion; consequently that men may be in complete
  error on the subject without incurring the charge of sinfulness。 (42) We
  need now no longer wonder that God adapted Himself to the existing opinions
  and imaginations of the prophets; or that the faithful held different ideas
  of God; as we showed in Chap。 II。; or; again; that the sacred books speak
  very inaccurately of God; attributing to Him hands; feet; eyes; ears; a
  mind; and motion from one place to another; or that they ascribe to Him
  emotions; such as jealousy; mercy; &c。; or; lastly; that they describe
  Him as a Judge in heaven sitting on a royal throne with Christ on His
  right hand。 (43) Such expressions are