coming　into　mediation　with　itself　through　the　negativity　of　itself　…　is
  self…relatedness；　only　in　so　far　as　it　is　relation　to　an　Other　…　this　Other　however
  coming　to　view　at　first　not　as　something　which　is；　but　as　postulated　and
  hypothesised。
  Being　has　not　vanished：　but；　firstly；　Essence；　as　simple　self…relation；　is　Being；　and
  secondly　as　regards　its　one…sided　characteristic　of　immediacy；　Being　is　deposed　to
  a　mere　negative；　to　a　seeming　or　reflected　light　…　Essence　accordingly　is　Being
  thus　reflecting　light　into　itself。
  The　Absolute　is　the　Essence。　This　is　the　same　definition　as　the　previous　one　that
  the　Absolute　is　Being；　in　so　far　as　Being　likewise　is　simple　self…relation。　But　it　is　at
  the　same　time　higher；　because　Essence　is　Being　that　has　gone　into　itself：　that　is　to
  say；　the　simple　self…relation　（in　Being）　is　expressly　put　as　negation　of　the　negative
  is　immanent　self…mediation。　Unfortunately；　when　the　Absolute　is　defined　to　be
  Essence；　the　negativity　which　this　implies　is　often　taken　only　to　mean　the
  withdrawal　of　all　determinate　predicates。　This　negative　action　of　withdrawal　or
  abstraction　thus　falls　outside　of　the　Essence　…　which　is　thus　left　as　a　mere　result
  apart　from　its　premises　…　the　caput　mortuum　of　abstraction。　But　as　this　negativity；
  instead　of　being　external　to　Being；　is　its　own　dialectic；　the　truth　of　the　latter；　viz。；
  Essence；　will　be　Being　as　retired　within　itself　…　immanent　Being。
  That　reflection；　or　light　thrown　into　itself；　constitutes　the　distinction　between
  Essence　and　immediate　Being；　and　is　the　peculiar　characteristic　of　Essence　itself。
  §　112n
  Any　mention　of　Essence　implies　that　we　distinguish　it　from　Being：　the　latter　is　immediate；　and；
  compared　with　the　Essence；　we　look　upon　it　as　mere　seeming。　But　this　seeming　is　not　an　utter
  nonentity　and　nothing　at　all；　but　Being　superseded　and　put　by。　The　point　of　view　given　by　the
  Essence　is　in　general　the　standpoint　of　'Reflection'。　This　word　'reflection'　is　originally　applied；　when
  a　ray　of　light　in　a　straight　line　impinging　upon　the　surface　of　a　mirror　is　thrown　back　from　it。　In　this
  phenomenon　we　have　two　things　…　first　an　immediate　fact　which　is；　and　secondly　the　deputed；
  derivated；　or　transmitted　phase　of　the　same。　Something　of　this　sort　takes　place　when　we　reflect；　or
  think　upon　an　object：　for　here　we　want　to　know　the　object；　not　in　its　immediacy；　but　as　derivative
  or　mediated。　The　problem　or　aim　of　philosophy　is　often　represented　as　the　ascertainment　of　the
  essence　of　things：　a　phrase　which　only　means　that　things；　instead　of　being　left　in　their　immediacy；
  must　be　shown　to　be　mediated　by；　or　based　upon；　something　else。　The　immediate　Being　of　things
  is　thus　conceived　under　the　image　of　a　rind　or　curtain　behind　which　the　Essence　is　hidden。
  ？
  Everything；　it　is　said；　has　an　Essence；　that　is；　things　really　are　not　what　they　immediately　show
  themselves。　There　is　something　more　to　be　done　than　merely　rove　from　one　quality　to　another；　and
  merely　to　advance　from　qualitative　to　quantitative；　and　vice　versa：　there　is　a　permanence　in　things；
  and　that　permanence　is　in　the　first　instance　their　Essence。
  With　respect　to　other　meanings　and　uses　of　the　category　of　Essence；　we　may　note　that　in　the
  German　auxiliary　verb；　sein　（to　be）；　the　past　tense　is　expressed　by　the　term　for　Essence　（wesen）：
  we　designate　past　being　as　gewesen。　This　anomaly　of　language　implies　to　some　extent　a　correct
  perception　of　the　relation　between　Being　and　Essence。　Essence　we　may　certainly　regard　as　past
  Being；　remembering　however　meanwhile　that　the　past　is　not　utterly　denied；　but　only　laid　aside　and
  thus　at　the　same　time　preserved。
  。。。　the　category　of　Essence　is　often　liable　to　an　abstract　use；　by　which；　in　the　study　of　anything；　its
  Essence　is　held　to　be　something　unaffected　by；　and　subsisting　in　independence　of；　its　definite
  phenomenal　embodiment。　Thus　we　say；　for　example；　of　people；　that　the　great　thing　is　not　what
  they　do　or　how　they　behave；　but　what　they　are。　This　is　correct；　if　it　means　that　a　man's　conduct
  should　be　looked　at；　not　in　its　immediacy；　but　only　as　it　is　explained　by　his　inner　self；　and　as　a
  relevation　of　that　inner　self。　Still　it　should　be　remembered　that　the　only　means　by　which　the
  Essence　and　the　inner　self　can　be　verified　is　their　appearance　in　outward　reality；　whereas　the
  appeal　which　men　make　to　the　essential　life；　as　distinct　from　the　material　facts　of　conduct；　is
  generally　prompted　by　a　desire　to　assert　their　own　subjectivity　and　to　elude　an　absolute　and
  objective　judgement。
  §　113
  Identity
  Self…relation　in　Essence　is　the　form　of　Identity　or　of　reflection…into…self；　which
  has　here　taken　the　place　of　the　immediacy　of　Being。　They　are　both　the　same
  abstraction　…　self…relation。
  The　unintelligence　of　sense；　to　take　everything　limited　and　finite　for　Being；　passes
  into　the　obstinacy　of　understanding；　which　views　the　finite　as　self…identical；　not
  inherently　self…contradictory。
  The　Unessential
  §　114
  This　identity；　as　it　descended　from　Being；　appears　in　the　first　place　only　charged
  with　the　characteristics　of　Being；　and　referred　to　Being　as　to　something　external。
  This　external　Being；　if　taken　in　separation　from　the　true　Being　（of　Essence）；　is
  called　the　Unessential。　But　that　turns　out　to　be　a　mistake。　Because　Essence　is
  Being…in…self；　it　is　essential　only　to　the　extent　that　it　has　in　itself　its　negative；　i。e。
  reference　to　another；　or　mediation。　Consequently；　it　has　the　unessential　as　its　own
  proper　seeming　（reflection）　in　itself。　But　in　seeming　or　mediation　there　is
  distinction　involved：　and　since　what　is　distinguished　（as　distinguished　from　identity
  out　of　which　it　arises；　and　in　which　it　is　not；　or　lies　as　seeming）　receives　itself　the
  form　of　identity；　the　semblance　is　still　not　in　the　mode　of　Being；　or　of　self…related
  immediacy。
  The　sphere　of　Essence　thus　turns　out　to　be　a　still　imperfect　combination　of
  immediacy　and　mediation。　In　it　every　term　is　expressly　invested　with　the
  character　of　self…relatedness；　while　yet　at　the　same　time　one　is　forced　beyond　it。　It
  has　Being　…　reflected　being；　a　being　in　which　another　shows；　and　which　shows　in
  another。　And　so　it　is　also　the　sphere　in　which　the　contradiction；　still　implicit　in　the
  sphere　of　Being；　is　made　explicit。
  As　this　one　notion　is　the　common　principle　underlying　all　logic；　there　appear　in　the
  development　of　Essence　the　same　attributes　or　terms　as　in　the　development　of
  Being；　but　in　reflex　form。　Instead　of　Being　and　Nought　we　have　now　the　forms　of
  Positive　and　Negative；　the　former　at　first　as　Identity　corresponding　to　pure　and
  uncontrasted　Being；　the　latter　developed　（showing　in　itself）　as　Difference。　So　also；
  we　have　Being　represented　by　the　Ground　of　determinate　Being：　which　shows
  itself；　when　reflected　upon　the　Ground；　as　Existence。
  The　theory　of　Essence　is　the　most　difficult　branch　of　Logic。　It　includes　the
  categories　of　metaphysic　and　of　the　sciences　in　general。　These　are　the　products　of
  reflective　understanding；　which；　while　it　assumes　the　differences　to　possess　a
  footing　of　their　own；　and　at　the　same　time　also　expressly　affirms　their　relativity；
  still　combines　the　two　statements；　side　by　side；　or　one　after　the　other；　by　an　'also'；
  without　bringing　these　thoughts　into　one；　or　unifying　them　into　the　notion。
  The　Development　of　Reflection
  GROUND　…　EXISTENCE　…　THE　THING
  A。　ESSENCE　AS　GROUND　OF　EXISTENCE
  （a）　The　pure　principle　or　categories　of　Reflection
  （i）　Identity
  §　115
  The　Essence　lights　up　in　itself　or　is　mere　reflection：　and　therefore　is　only
  self…relation；　not　as　immediate　but　as　reflected。　And　that　reflex　relation　is　This
  identity　becomes　an　Identity；　in　form　only；　or　of　the　understanding；　if　it　be　held
  hard　and　fast；　quite　aloof　from　difference。　Or；　rather；　abstraction　is　the　imposition
  of　this　Identity　of　form；　the　transformation　of　something　inherently　concrete　into
  this　form　of　elementary　simplicity。　And　this　may　be　done　in　two　ways。　Either　we
  may　neglect　a　part　of　the　multiple　features　which　are　found　in　the　concrete　thing
  （by　what　is　called　analysis）　and　select　only　one　of　them；　or；　neglecting　their
  variety；　we　may　concentrate　the　multiple　character　into　one。
  If　we　associate　Identity　with　the　Absolute；　making　the　Absolute　the　subject　of　a
  proposition；　we　get：　The　Absolute　is　what　is　identical　with　itself。　However；　true
  this　proposition　may　be；　it　is　doubtful　whether　it　be　meant　in　its　truth：　and
  therefore　it　is　at　least　imperfect　in　the　expression。　For　it　is　left　undecided；　whether
  it　means　the　abstract　Identity　of　understanding…　abstract。　that　is；　because
  contrasted　with　the　other　characteristics　of　Essence　…　or　the　Identity　which　is
  inherently　concrete。　In　the　latter　case；　as　will　be　seen；　true　identity　is　first
  discoverable　in　the　Ground；　and；　with　a　higher　truth；　in　the　Notion。　Even　the
  word　Absolute　is　often　used　to　mean　more　than　'abstract'。　Absolute　space